Implement Allocator for &mut A where A: Allocator + ?Sized
#146826
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Collaborator
Member
|
Sorry for being so slow here, looks good! |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2025
… r=scottmcm Implement `Allocator` for `&mut A` where `A: Allocator + ?Sized` This is a breaking change to the unstable `allocator_api` feature. Tracking issue rust-lang#32838. It implements the accepted api change proposal from rust-lang/libs-team#508. The code for the blanket implementation is the same as the one for `&A`, just with the `mut` added.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2025
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - #146826 (Implement `Allocator` for `&mut A` where `A: Allocator + ?Sized`) - #148487 (add Option::into_flat_iter) - #148814 (stabilize `array_windows`) - #149401 (Fix `name()` functions for local defs in rustc_public) - #149683 (Fix armv8r-none-eabihf tier) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2025
Rollup merge of #146826 - bluurryy:impl-allocator-for-mut-a, r=scottmcm Implement `Allocator` for `&mut A` where `A: Allocator + ?Sized` This is a breaking change to the unstable `allocator_api` feature. Tracking issue #32838. It implements the accepted api change proposal from rust-lang/libs-team#508. The code for the blanket implementation is the same as the one for `&A`, just with the `mut` added.
This was referenced Dec 8, 2025
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2025
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#146826 (Implement `Allocator` for `&mut A` where `A: Allocator + ?Sized`) - rust-lang/rust#148487 (add Option::into_flat_iter) - rust-lang/rust#148814 (stabilize `array_windows`) - rust-lang/rust#149401 (Fix `name()` functions for local defs in rustc_public) - rust-lang/rust#149683 (Fix armv8r-none-eabihf tier) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a breaking change to the unstable
allocator_apifeature. Tracking issue #32838.It implements the accepted api change proposal from rust-lang/libs-team#508.
The code for the blanket implementation is the same as the one for
&A, just with themutadded.