-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 554
Mention our policy on typofixes for internal docs #2536
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Thanks for the PR. If you have write access, feel free to merge this PR if it does not need reviews. You can request a review using |
r? rustc-dev-guide (just to get a +1 and be sure this is fine) |
what counts as internal docs |
I linked in the other PR some examples. |
a summary seems to be...
|
we could be more explicit and say something like...
|
do people consider rustc api docs internal docs |
You mean the |
would be good to be more concrete what we consider internal docs so far, I have this list
|
0ce6ea3
to
58b6729
Compare
58b6729
to
c263c60
Compare
hope now it's clearer |
Sister PR of rust-forge#926.
Add clearer wording about our "spellchecking / typos" contributing policy to discourage spellcheck patches on internal documentation.