Skip to content

Conversation

@BoxyUwU
Copy link
Member

@BoxyUwU BoxyUwU commented Nov 29, 2025

This chapter feels a bit incomplete without accompanying docs for adjustments and expectations but that can definitely be a future PR ✨ cc #2663

The structure of this chapter is kinda meh, it's mostly just a pile of information in not too much of a thought out reading order

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 29, 2025

Thanks for the PR. If you have write access, feel free to merge this PR if it does not need reviews. You can request a review using r? rustc-dev-guide or r? <username>.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: this PR is waiting for a reviewer to verify its content label Nov 29, 2025
@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

@spastorino spastorino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This chapter looks very good ❤️. Very nice use of examples. Not sure if you want some other feedback but my usual way is, we can merge things that are better than the current state and then improve later.


Coercions are implicit operations which transform a value into a different type. A coercion *site* is a position where a coercion is able to be implicitly performed. There are two kinds of coercion sites:
- one-to-one
- LUB (Least-Uppper-Bound)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- LUB (Least-Uppper-Bound)
- LUB (Least-Upper-Bound)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: this PR is waiting for a reviewer to verify its content

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants