A Zero-Trust Security Layer for LLM APIs Control who, how, and why AI is used inside your organization.
Today, LLM usage inside organizations is largely ungoverned:
- API keys are scattered across services
- No control over what prompts are being sent
- No enforcement of business purpose
- No protection against:
- Prompt injection
- Data exfiltration
- Misuse (e.g., non-business queries)
- No audit trail or accountability
👉 Result: Security, compliance, and cost risks grow silently
LLM Wall acts as a centralized proxy layer between your applications and LLM providers.
It enforces:
- 🔐 Zero-trust prompt validation
- 🎯 Purpose-based access control
- 🧠 Multi-agent threat detection
- 📊 Risk scoring + decision engine
- 🧾 Immutable audit logging (blockchain-backed)
- 🌐 Distributed threat intelligence (Sentinel mesh)
LLM access should be governed like production database access.
┌────────────────────┐
│ Client Apps │
│ (ML / Backend APIs)│
└─────────┬──────────┘
│
▼
┌────────────────────┐
│ LLM Wall │
│ (FastAPI Proxy) │
└─────────┬──────────┘
│
┌─────────────────┼─────────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
┌────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ Guardian │ │ Sentinel │ │ Ledger │
│ (Security) │ │ (Threat Mesh) │ │ (Audit Chain)│
└────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘
│
▼
┌────────────────────┐
│ External LLM APIs │
│ OpenAI / Ollama │
│ Gemini / NVIDIA │
└────────────────────┘
A multi-agent system that analyzes every prompt:
| Agent | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Intent Agent | Detects suspicious intent |
| Injection Agent | Detects prompt injection (jailbreaking) |
| CoT Inspector | Detects reasoning anomalies |
| Fidelity Agent | Enforces business-purpose alignment |
| IOC Matcher | Matches known threats against a database |
- Risk Score: (0–100)
- Threat Category: Identified vulnerability type
- Action:
allow|rate_limit|block
Each deployment defines a strict system purpose to prevent "hallucination-as-a-service" or personal misuse:
app_system_purpose = """
This system is a professional LLM interface for business operations.
It should not be used for personal, creative, or unrelated purposes.
"""| Prompt | Result | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| "Explain DevOps" | ✅ Allowed | Business-related educational query |
| "Tell me a joke" | ❌ Blocked | Out of scope (Fidelity check failed) |
| "Write a story" | ❌ Blocked | Non-business creative request |
- ✅ OpenAI-compatible API (
/v1/chat/completions) - 🔐 API key abstraction (backend keys are never exposed to clients)
- 🧠 Multi-agent security analysis for defense-in-depth
- ⚖️ Confidence-weighted risk scoring
- 🚫 Hard-block for high-risk signals
- 🧾 Blockchain-based audit logs for non-repudiation
- 🤖 MARL-based adaptive decision engine
Risk: 80/100 (HIGH) | Primary threat: out_of_scope
[intent_agent] score=35 conf=0.60
[fidelity_agent] score=80 conf=1.00: Out-of-scope request detected.
git clone [https://github.com/yourusername/llm-wall](https://github.com/yourusername/llm-wall)
cd llm-wall
python -m venv .venv
source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
uvicorn llm_wall.core.app:app --reloadfrom openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
base_url="http://localhost:8000/v1",
api_key="internal-app-token"
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o-mini",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain DevOps"}]
)
print(response.choices[0].message.content)Eliminate API key sprawl. Manage all provider connections (OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama) from a single control plane.
Protect against prompt injection and data exfiltration before the data ever leaves your network.
Track usage per team and enforce strict rate limits to prevent runaway API costs from inefficient loops or misuse.
Maintain a full, immutable audit trail of every interaction for regulatory requirements and forensic analysis.
- 🔐 RBAC: Per-application API keys and fine-grained permissions.
- ☸️ K8s Sidecar: Deployment as a service mesh sidecar.
- 📊 Dashboard: Real-time risk and cost monitoring in Grafana.
- 🔍 Lineage: Tracking prompt evolution across multi-step agents.