Skip to content

Conversation

@lrytz
Copy link
Member

@lrytz lrytz commented Nov 6, 2025

No description provided.

@lrytz lrytz mentioned this pull request Nov 6, 2025
78 tasks
@som-snytt
Copy link

The one about the macro using untypecheck was not a false positive, it was the lint doing its job.

That was a combination of broken untypecheck and not using -Wmacros:default (which lowers the burden for the macro coder).

scala/scala#11170

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

I pushed some adjustments (d6d0e1c)

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

SethTisue commented Nov 17, 2025

The one about the macro using untypecheck was not a false positive, it was the lint doing its job

@som-snytt can you change that PR title to something you feel is more accurate? Then we can adjust the notes.

@som-snytt
Copy link

@SethTisue I removed "false" from the narrative and added "untypecheck", otherwise preserving the lrytz edit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants