Skip to content

Conversation

@feeblefakie
Copy link
Contributor

This is an automated backport of the following:

Please merge this PR after all checks have passed.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @feeblefakie, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request is an automated backport that modifies the JDBC transaction manager's behavior regarding transaction isolation levels. Previously, it explicitly set the isolation level to SERIALIZABLE. This change removes that explicit setting, allowing the system to utilize the default isolation level provided by the underlying database storage. This can offer greater flexibility and potentially better performance depending on the specific database configuration and workload.

Highlights

  • JDBC Transaction Isolation: The explicit setting of the default transaction isolation level to SERIALIZABLE for JDBC transaction managers has been removed.
  • Default Isolation Level: The system will now rely on the underlying storage's default transaction isolation level instead of forcing SERIALIZABLE.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request backports a change that removes the hardcoded default transaction isolation level of SERIALIZABLE for JDBC transactions. Instead, it will now use the underlying storage's default isolation level unless one is explicitly specified in the configuration. This change improves flexibility and aligns with the expected behavior of using database defaults. The change itself is correct, but I've suggested adding a unit test to cover the new default behavior to prevent regressions.

@Torch3333 Torch3333 merged commit a38bf9b into 3 Oct 22, 2025
170 of 173 checks passed
@Torch3333 Torch3333 deleted the 3-pull-3076 branch October 22, 2025 00:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants