Skip to content

fix: check .raw length on setting#2351

Open
flying-sheep wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
pa/check-raw-len
Open

fix: check .raw length on setting#2351
flying-sheep wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
pa/check-raw-len

Conversation

@flying-sheep
Copy link
Member

Going through all the newly marked as stale issues, and while a lot can be closed, some are still valid!

@flying-sheep flying-sheep added this to the 0.12.11 milestone Feb 20, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 20, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 63.63636% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 47.51%. Comparing base (5b1a8c5) to head (9af2a0b).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/anndata/_core/anndata.py 75.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
src/anndata/_core/raw.py 33.33% 2 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your project check has failed because the head coverage (47.51%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (5b1a8c5) and HEAD (9af2a0b). Click for more details.

HEAD has 11 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (5b1a8c5) HEAD (9af2a0b)
12 1
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2351       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   87.34%   47.51%   -39.83%     
===========================================
  Files          49       49               
  Lines        7775     7780        +5     
===========================================
- Hits         6791     3697     -3094     
- Misses        984     4083     +3099     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/anndata/_core/anndata.py 49.33% <75.00%> (-34.00%) ⬇️
src/anndata/_core/raw.py 45.51% <33.33%> (-34.07%) ⬇️

... and 32 files with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

adata.obs_names should be the same as adata.raw.obs_names

1 participant

Comments