Skip to content

Conversation

gilsegment
Copy link
Contributor

ticket

https://twilio-engineering.atlassian.net/browse/CLAS-1069

Proposed changes

Updating Reverse-ETL Setup with BigQuery Storage-API

Merge timing

TBD

@gilsegment gilsegment requested a review from a team as a code owner September 16, 2025 12:09
Comment on lines +84 to +88
When setting up a BigQuery Reverse ETL source, you can choose which API Segment uses to read from BigQuery. You can make this selection during the initial setup, or later from Sources > Reverse ETL > BigQuery Source > Settings > Connection Settings.
- **REST API**
Recommended for most tables. REST is generally more cost-efficient, but syncs may be slower for very large datasets.
- **Storage API**
Recommended for large tables. The Storage API can significantly improve throughput and reduce sync times, but may incur higher costs. See [BigQuery Storage API client libraries](https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/reference/storage/libraries) and [BigQuery pricing for data extraction](https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/pricing?hl=en#data_extraction_pricing) for more information
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@gilsegment is there a reason why you want this info added after step 10? the placement of this info is very weird as step 10 is about the data location, unless you're saying that choosing which API Segment uses is related to the data location?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants