-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 245
ci: Integrate github inline annotation for clippy #655
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
jerensl
wants to merge
2
commits into
servo:main
Choose a base branch
from
jerensl:integrate-github-inline-annotation-for-clippy
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it correct that action will only fail the build as long as annotations are enabled? If annotations are ever disabled using
with-annotations: false
then onlycargo clippy
will be run but without the-D warnings
that this CI setup is using. Is there a way we can fail the build even if annotations are disabled?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can still use
-D warnings
whenwith-annotations
is set to false. This flag only causes issues if--message-format=json
is specified after-- -D warnings
. It only works when placed before it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure I follow. The issue I'm referring to is the behaviour of
cargo clippy
when-D warnings
is not passed (as in our action). Without-D warnings
,cargo clippy
will exit successfully even when there are lint violations and won't block the build.In the current setup in this repo,
-D warnings
is being passed explicitly to makecargo clippy
fail when there are violations. But in our action, we don't do that and rely on the annotations.sh toexit 1
if there are violations. However, that doesn't happen if annotations get disabled.The question is if we can change the action to always fail, even if
with-annotations
is false.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I add new PR here so we can add
-- -D warnings
whenwith-annotation
istrue
, so our CI dont get cancelThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure that we need to support explicitly passing
-- D warnings
in the action in order to preserve the behavior here. I'm thinking maybe we just executeannotations.sh
always in the action, regardless ofwith-annotations
being true or false, but only echo the GH annotation logs if with-annotations is true.