Skip to content

Conversation

@weiznich
Copy link

During a dependency review we noticed that the smallvec crate includes a development script. This development script shouldn't be there as they might, at some point become problematic. As of now they prevent any downstream user from enabling the [bans.build.interpreted] option of cargo deny.

I opted for using an explicit include list instead of an exclude list to prevent these files from beeing included in the published packages to make sure that everything that's included is an conscious choice.

During a dependency review we noticed that the smallvec crate includes a development script. This development script shouldn't be there as they might, at some point become problematic. As of now they prevent any downstream user from enabling the `[bans.build.interpreted]` option of cargo deny.

I opted for using an explicit include list instead of an exclude list to prevent these files from beeing included in the published packages to make sure that everything that's included is an conscious choice.
Copy link
Contributor

@nicoburns nicoburns left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll give others a chance to review before merging, but LGTM.

We'll probably also want to do this for the v2 branch.

Copy link
Member

@mrobinson mrobinson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants