feat(parser): add test for optional time.Time

[FranciscoKurpiel]

This PR adds a test case to ensure that optional time.Time fields are handled correctly when an empty string is provided as a value.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @FranciscoKurpiel, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the test suite by introducing a dedicated test case for optional time.Time fields within the parser. The primary goal is to confirm that the parser accurately handles various inputs for these fields, particularly when an empty string is supplied, thereby improving the reliability and correctness of time parsing logic.

Highlights

• New Test Case for Optional time.Time: A new test case has been added to TestOptionalBasicTypes to specifically verify the parsing behavior of optional time.Time fields. This includes scenarios where no value is provided, an empty string is provided, and a valid time string is provided.
• Empty String Handling: The test case explicitly checks that optional time.Time fields correctly handle an empty string input, ensuring the parser behaves as expected without errors in such situations.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds a test case for optional time.Time fields, ensuring they are handled correctly when an empty string is provided. The change is correct and aligns with the library's behavior. I've provided two suggestions to improve the robustness of the new test:

1. Use a fixed time value instead of time.Now() to make the test deterministic.
2. Use the existing assert.EqualFn helper for comparing time.Time values to avoid potential issues with Go's == operator on time structs, which can lead to flaky tests.