Skip to content

Conversation

@hxu-bnl
Copy link
Contributor

@hxu-bnl hxu-bnl commented Dec 2, 2025

  • Add support for EL9xxx and tested on EL9505.
  • Add entry for EL2798

@hxu-bnl
Copy link
Contributor Author

hxu-bnl commented Dec 2, 2025

“‘POWERSUPPLY’ seems like a better term to describe the terminals.

@hxu-bnl hxu-bnl closed this Dec 2, 2025
@hxu-bnl hxu-bnl reopened this Dec 2, 2025
@JJL772
Copy link
Member

JJL772 commented Dec 2, 2025

I believe 90XX terminals are not strictly power supplies (ex: EL9011 is a plastic end cap). I think it's fine to categorize them as such though.

Copy link
Member

@JJL772 JJL772 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the contribution! I apologize for the messy code in this module; I'm in the process of cleaning it up.

@hxu-bnl
Copy link
Contributor Author

hxu-bnl commented Dec 2, 2025

Thanks for the quick review.

@JJL772 JJL772 merged commit 8f09b53 into slac-epics:pre-release Dec 2, 2025
10 of 11 checks passed
This was referenced Dec 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants