Merged
Conversation
I suspect this code to have been integrated in the SofaPython3 by mistake and to have never worked. By looking at it it may be an experiment to allow syntax like this import Sofa.Components Sofa.Components.MechanicalObject() ...
…nows about them. The problem: Depending on the definition order of the binded classes, there may have incorrect types if Base is useing BaseData... but BaseData is only binded after Base. The PR propose a solution for that using a decidcated "forward" registration patter.
Contributor
Author
|
@hugtalbot ci pass... |
fredroy
approved these changes
Oct 15, 2024
Contributor
|
I believe that some parts of this PR should have been in #457 |
Contributor
Author
I agree with you :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I suspect this code to have been integrated in the SofaPython3 by mistake and to have never really worked.
By looking at it it may be an experiment to allow syntax like this
So let's make it simple, remove this. Unless someone can explain what it does.