Skip to content

Conversation

@ifefamojuro
Copy link
Contributor

@ifefamojuro ifefamojuro commented Jan 8, 2026

Update the WebSDK Types Package version

@ifefamojuro ifefamojuro marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2026 21:15
@ifefamojuro ifefamojuro requested a review from a team as a code owner January 8, 2026 21:15
},
"dependencies": {
"@square/web-payments-sdk-types": "^1.79.0"
"@square/web-payments-sdk-types": "^1.81.1"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why do we need to do this manually?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ifefamojuro ifefamojuro Jan 8, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This package uses npm/npx based package controls, rather than the yarn + yarn upgrade-interactive that we are used to

Copy link
Contributor

@nwilmessquare nwilmessquare Jan 9, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We normally see types version updates as dependabot PRs. In fact, I see one open right now (PR #503)

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ifefamojuro ifefamojuro Jan 9, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wanted to test our new NPM key, by prompting the release of a new package version. According to the runbooks, the best way to do this is with a fix pr (ex. here)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it, makes sense.

@sirianil sirianil self-requested a review January 9, 2026 16:11
@ifefamojuro ifefamojuro merged commit 010fa40 into beta Jan 9, 2026
8 checks passed
@ifefamojuro ifefamojuro deleted the ifamojuro/upgrade-types-package branch January 9, 2026 17:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants