Skip to content

Conversation

@farazghani
Copy link

@farazghani farazghani commented Nov 18, 2025


type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:

  • task: lint_filenames status: passed
  • task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
  • task: lint_markdown status: passed
  • task: lint_package_json status: passed
  • task: lint_repl_help status: passed
  • task: lint_javascript_src status: passed
  • task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_examples status: passed
  • task: lint_javascript_tests status: passed
  • task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: passed
  • task: lint_python status: na
  • task: lint_r status: na
  • task: lint_c_src status: na
  • task: lint_c_examples status: na
  • task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na
  • task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
  • task: lint_shell status: na
  • task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed
  • task: lint_typescript_tests status: passed
  • task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---

Resolves #{{TODO: add issue number}}.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • {{This pull request adds a new package:

@stdlib/string/base/concat

The package provides a minimal, fixed-arity string concatenation utility:

var concat = require( '@stdlib/string/base/concat' );
var out = concat( 'hello', 'world' );
// => 'helloworld'

This implementation intentionally mirrors the behavior and structure of other @stdlib/string/base/* utilities, such as lowercase and uppercase, but offers fixed-arity concatenation (two arguments only). A future package will address variadic string concatenation.}}

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

  • Yes
  • No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

  • Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
  • Test/benchmark generation
  • Documentation (including examples)
  • Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

{{I consulted chatpgt to verify my code that i wrote with reference to the module uppercase and lowercase}}


@stdlib-js/reviewers

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: passed
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello! Thank you for your contribution to stdlib.

We noticed that the contributing guidelines acknowledgment is missing from your pull request. Here's what you need to do:

  1. Please read our contributing guidelines.

  2. Update your pull request description to include this checked box:

    - [x] Read, understood, and followed the [contributing guidelines](https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md)

This acknowledgment confirms that you've read the guidelines, which include:

  • The developer's certificate of origin
  • Your agreement to license your contributions under the project's terms

We can't review or accept contributions without this acknowledgment.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. We look forward to reviewing your contribution!

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added First-time Contributor A pull request from a contributor who has never previously committed to the project repository. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Nov 18, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
string/base/concat $\color{green}81/81$
$color{green}+100.00%$
$\color{green}3/3$
$color{green}+100.00%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$color{green}+100.00%$
$\color{green}81/81$
$color{green}+100.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@kgryte
Copy link
Member

kgryte commented Nov 18, 2025

Ref: #8521

@kgryte kgryte added autoclose: Already Resolved Pull request which should be auto-closed due proposed changes duplicating already included changes. and removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Nov 18, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for working on this pull request. However, we cannot accept your contribution as the issue this pull request seeks to resolve has already been addressed in a different pull request or commit.

Thank you again for your interest in stdlib, and we look forward to reviewing your future contributions.

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot closed this Nov 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

autoclose: Already Resolved Pull request which should be auto-closed due proposed changes duplicating already included changes. First-time Contributor A pull request from a contributor who has never previously committed to the project repository.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants