DP-1

[praxpk]

No description provided.

[super30admin]

Strengths:

• Both solutions are correct and efficient.
• The use of dynamic programming is appropriate and well-implemented.
• Code is readable and well-commented.
• Variable names are descriptive, making the code easy to understand.

Areas for Improvement:

• In the coin change solution, the comment could be more detailed to explain the dynamic programming approach more clearly.
• In the house robber solution, the use of a list of tuples is a bit unconventional. While it works, a more common approach might be to use two separate variables to track the "rob" and "not rob" states, which could slightly improve readability and reduce space usage (to O(1) if optimized further).