Skip to content

Conversation

@avishwak
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

The student's solution demonstrates a good understanding of pandas operations and SQL-like transformations. Here's a detailed evaluation:

  1. Correctness:
  • For Problem 1 (Department Highest Salary), both solutions appear correct. Solution 1 uses groupby and merge operations effectively, while Solution 2 demonstrates understanding of transform() which is more efficient for this use case.
  • For Problem 2 (Rank Scores), the solution correctly implements dense ranking as required.
  1. Time Complexity:
  • Problem 1 solutions: O(n log n) for groupby operations and O(n) for merges
  • Problem 2 solution: O(n log n) for sorting and ranking
    These are optimal for pandas operations.
  1. Space Complexity:
  • Both problems create new DataFrames during operations, resulting in O(n) space complexity, which is expected for these transformations.
  1. Code Quality:
  • Good use of pandas operations and chaining
  • Clear variable naming
  • Helpful comments explaining key concepts
  • Could improve by:
    • Adding docstrings to functions
    • Using more descriptive variable names (e.g., 'result_df' instead of just 'df')
    • Including edge case handling comments (e.g., empty DataFrames)
  1. Efficiency:
  • Solution 2 for Problem 1 is more efficient as it avoids creating intermediate DataFrames
  • Both solutions could potentially benefit from using inplace=True where possible to reduce memory usage

Additional suggestions:

  • Consider adding input validation
  • Include example test cases in comments
  • For Problem 1, the column renaming could be done earlier in the pipeline for clarity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants