Conversation
a4d8248 to
6d90a3d
Compare
ea83130 to
899352a
Compare
c9456c0 to
67c1339
Compare
f16e67a to
4e66bd3
Compare
47000ce to
c6ee296
Compare
ba4d9e6 to
6d5cd4c
Compare
023c526 to
fc902d0
Compare
51d5755 to
a68d11b
Compare
6035b03 to
33b6cb5
Compare
c49dd72 to
b4a720e
Compare
8813362 to
33ab2c1
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implement lock-based fallback using swap/load/store when the
fallbackfeature is enabled because CAS is unavailable. This is not great, but if the upstream bug that causes errors when using CAS (rust-lang/rust#106795 (comment)) is fixed in the future, we can implement {8,16,32,64}-bit atomic using 64-bit CAS.Closes #29