Conversation
…caching - Corrected references to 'AI-powered' visual detection, accurately describing it as 'algorithm-driven' using pure Kotlin (pHash, SAD, Laplacian variance). - Updated visual detection processing details to mention sequential frame processing via `MediaExtractor.advance()` instead of seek-based sampling. - Added documentation for the new 'Waveform Caching' optimization using `LruCache` in `CustomVideoSeeker`. - Clarified that silence detection uses absolute `rawAmplitudes` to prevent false amplification of quiet clips. - Fixed markdown indentation for nested bullet points under the Detection Engine section. Co-authored-by: tazztone <62671577+tazztone@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
- Updated target SDK from 35 to 36 under Prerequisites to match the `libs.versions.toml` configuration. Co-authored-by: tazztone <62671577+tazztone@users.noreply.github.com>
Updated the README.md to ensure the documentation accurately reflects recent technical implementations regarding the visual smart detection engine (algorithm-driven vs AI-powered, processing mechanism), waveform caching, and silence detection amplitude logic. Also fixed minor formatting issues.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 16793316726719096554 started by @tazztone