Support ModelCardGenerator in Vertex AI

[jeongukjae]

Fixes #259

Changes the ModelCard artifact's TYPE_NAME from "ModelCard" to "tfx_addons.ModelCard" to conform with the Kubeflow V2 schema.

For detailed descriptions of the changes, check out this comment.

In v1.12, there are another errors.

ModelCard artifact does not satisfy the schema title regex (^[a-z][a-z0-9-_]{2,20}[.][A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9-_]{2,49}$, no nested classpath). So ModelCard artifact's TYPE_NAME should be updated.

https://github.com/tensorflow/tfx/blob/2fd4f95ce3e631e7763611fd8ed631d59bc053d8/tfx/orchestration/kubeflow/v2/compiler_utils.py#L302-L335

ModelCard artifact type should be accessible from tfx_addons (top-level module) to be resolved in kubeflow v2's container entrypoint. So tfx-addons should export all artifact types from top-level.

https://github.com/tensorflow/tfx/blob/2fd4f95ce3e631e7763611fd8ed631d59bc053d8/tfx/orchestration/kubeflow/v2/container/kubeflow_v2_entrypoint_utils.py#L219-L234

• Tests pass
• Appropriate changes to README are included in PR

[github-actions]

Thanks for the PR! 🚀

Instructions: Approve using /lgtm and mark for automatic merge by using /merge.

[codesue]

Thank you for your contribution, @jeongukjae! Does this pull request introduce any breaking changes?

@hanneshapke, would this resolve your errors in #249?

[jeongukjae]

@codesue It's changing the artifact's type, so I think this is a breaking change 🤔 but a small change I think?

[codesue]

It's been a while since I've worked directly with artifacts, so this gave me pause, but it does seem like a small change. We can point people back to this PR if they run into problems, so let's update the description of this PR to also include a brief summary of the changes. Something like

Changes the ModelCard artifact's TYPE_NAME from "ModelCard" to "tfx_addons.ModelCard" to conform with the Kubeflow V2 schema.

Otherwise this LGTM from the ModelCardGenerator side with passing tests.

[jeongukjae]

@codesue Great. I updated the PR body!

[codesue]

Hi @rcrowe-google or @casassg, would you please take a look at this PR since Hannes is currently unavailable. 🙏

[rcrowe-google]

The changes look ok to me, based on my limited knowledge of this code. However I'm not listed as an owner so I don't think I can actually approve this for merging:

Missing approvals for PR. Potential owners: @casassg, @hanneshapke, @codesue, @deutranium, @wihanbooyse, and @BACtaki

[casassg]

/lgtm

A suggestion: move artifact to a separate file similar to how we have for pkgs so that it avoids triggering all CI

[github-actions]

Approval received from @casassg! ✅

PR is approved. Missing merge command to auto-merge PR!

[casassg]

Feel free to comment / merge to merge btw