Skip to content

Conversation

s-h-a-d-o-w
Copy link

@s-h-a-d-o-w s-h-a-d-o-w commented Jan 11, 2025

What:

Since you're currently mentioning "./vitest.setup.ts", I figured that you're fine with using TS and this change does so consistently. (And once that is done, it's no longer necessary to add the setup file to the includes.)

Why:

Instructions are currently inconsistent.

Checklist:

  • Documentation
  • Tests N/A
  • Updated Type Definitions N/A
  • Ready to be merged

Copy link

@Bhavana104 Bhavana104 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reviewed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants