Skip to content

Conversation

@idlechild
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks like I made a half-baked solution here.

The silly thing is I know I investigated the return value of this fanfare method and I believe I determined there were two callers I would need to modify if I trampled the return value... and then I just didn't do anything about it. It's like I mentally marked off the work as done when it was definitely not done.

Anyway I think preserving the return value is simpler and I should have just done that the first time.

Planning to test and release later today.

@idlechild idlechild merged commit c6bc89e into tewtal:master Jul 30, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant