Skip to content

Update the k to the one empirically found with this model #16

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
kellychang4 merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2025
Merged

Update the k to the one empirically found with this model #16

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion vignettes/tractable-single-tract.Rmd
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ cst_summary <- summary(cst_fit)
cst_summary
```

Examining the summary of the resulting GAM fit object shows us that the `k = 16`
Examining the summary of the resulting GAM fit object shows us that the `k = 9`
is sufficiently large to describe the spatial variation of tract profile data.
In addition, we see that there is a statistically significant effect of group
(with a p-value of `r cst_summary$p.table["groupCTRL", "Pr(>|t|)"]`) and no statistically significant effect of age
Expand Down
Loading