Skip to content

Conversation

@paulineribeyre
Copy link
Collaborator

According to the coverage report, Requestor lost 13.4% coverage in #82 - this PR fixes that

Link to JIRA ticket if there is one:

New Features

Breaking Changes

Bug Fixes

Improvements

Dependency updates

Deployment changes

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 5, 2026

The style in this PR agrees with black. ✔️

This formatting comment was generated automatically by a script in uc-cdis/wool.

@nss10 nss10 self-requested a review January 5, 2026 18:11
[tool.coverage.run]
# fix for coverage reporting when using sqlalchemy async sessions
# (see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/74305054)
concurrency = ["multiprocessing", "thread", "greenlet"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 5, 2026

filepath passed SUBTOTAL
tests/test_client_credentials.py 1 1
tests/test_requestor.py 5 5
TOTAL 6 6

Please find the detailed integration test report here

Please find the Github Action logs here

@paulineribeyre paulineribeyre merged commit 2a6f5b5 into master Jan 5, 2026
9 checks passed
@paulineribeyre paulineribeyre deleted the fix/cov branch January 5, 2026 18:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants