-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 216
[Router][Bugfix] make healthcheck timeout customizable #538
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[Router][Bugfix] make healthcheck timeout customizable #538
Conversation
7ce50b0
to
c6f2d16
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @max-wittig, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces a new configuration option for the vllm_router
to allow users to customize the timeout for static backend health checks. This enhancement addresses scenarios where the default 30-second timeout might be insufficient for larger models or slower infrastructure, improving the router's adaptability and robustness.
Highlights
- Configurable Health Check Timeout: The static backend health check timeout, previously hardcoded to 30 seconds, is now customizable. This allows users to adjust the timeout for large models or slower environments, preventing premature health check failures.
- New CLI Argument: A new command-line argument,
--static-backend-health-checks-timeout
, has been introduced insrc/vllm_router/parsers/parser.py
. It accepts an integer value for the timeout in seconds and defaults to 30. - Service Discovery Integration: The
ServiceDiscovery
class insrc/vllm_router/service_discovery.py
has been updated to accept and store the new timeout value, which is then passed to theis_model_healthy
utility function during health checks. - Utility Function Update: The
is_model_healthy
function insrc/vllm_router/utils.py
now accepts atimeout
parameter, making the underlying HTTP request timeout configurable.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request introduces a customizable timeout for health checks, which is a valuable enhancement for users with large models or slower machines. The changes include adding a new argument to the parser, passing the timeout value through the service discovery, and using it in the health check function. The code is well-structured and the changes are focused on the intended functionality.
30 second timeout per model is enough for most people but somebody might use a very big model or use slow machines so it should also work for this use case. Customizing the health check interval will be done in another MR. Signed-off-by: Max Wittig <max.wittig@siemens.com>
c6f2d16
to
24ca715
Compare
30 second timeout per model is enough for most people but somebody might use a very big model or use slow machines so it should also work for this use case.
Customizing the health check interval will be done in another MR.
-s
when doinggit commit
[Bugfix]
,[Feat]
, and[CI]
.Detailed Checklist (Click to Expand)
Thank you for your contribution to production-stack! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps us maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.
PR Title and Classification
Please try to classify PRs for easy understanding of the type of changes. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:
[Bugfix]
for bug fixes.[CI/Build]
for build or continuous integration improvements.[Doc]
for documentation fixes and improvements.[Feat]
for new features in the cluster (e.g., autoscaling, disaggregated prefill, etc.).[Router]
for changes to thevllm_router
(e.g., routing algorithm, router observability, etc.).[Misc]
for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.
Code Quality
The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:
pre-commit
to format your code. SeeREADME.md
for installation.DCO and Signed-off-by
When contributing changes to this project, you must agree to the DCO. Commits must include a
Signed-off-by:
header which certifies agreement with the terms of the DCO.Using
-s
withgit commit
will automatically add this header.What to Expect for the Reviews
We aim to address all PRs in a timely manner. If no one reviews your PR within 5 days, please @-mention one of YuhanLiu11
, Shaoting-Feng or ApostaC.