Skip to content

Conversation

@arsalansufi
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

Closes #2259

In preparation for Maryland's upcoming pilot audit, we want to make sure that every jurisdiction in Maryland has at least one batch to audit. The base RLA batch selection logic doesn't guarantee that every jurisdiction has a batch, but we've added extra batches to samples before. Specifically, we add extra batches during every Georgia audit to ensure that every jurisdiction has at least one HMP and BMD ballot batch to audit and that every jurisdiction audits at least 2% of their ballots. For this Maryland pilot use case, the heuristic is much simpler. We just need to add a single batch for every jurisdiction that doesn't have a batch selected by default. The code mirrors the Georgia code.

Testing

  • Added an automated test

<option value={CvrFileType.DOMINION}>Dominion</option>
<option value={CvrFileType.CLEARBALLOT}>ClearBallot</option>
<option value={CvrFileType.ESS}>ES&amp;S</option>
<option value={CvrFileType.ESS_MD}>ES&amp;S (MD)</option>
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correcting a small mistake from when we added support for Maryland's specific style of ES&S CVRs. We only parse those CVRs for the purposes of batch audit file preparation, not ballot comparison audits. This commit just removes the option from the dropdown for latter.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

MD: Mimic GA logic for extra batch selection - one batch per county that did not have an RLA batch selected

2 participants