Skip to content

chore(desktop-app): weekly release v1.0.1 - March 02#6

Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
desktop-app-weekly-release-v1.0.1-2026-03-02
Open

chore(desktop-app): weekly release v1.0.1 - March 02#6
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
desktop-app-weekly-release-v1.0.1-2026-03-02

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Mar 2, 2026

Description

You can add the purpose of the change here or another context relevant to this PR. If any section does not make sense for your PR, please remove it. Also, take some care and 5 min to structure the PR description as this is usually the first thing the developer lands on while researching a bug.

Documentation

  • DevRev Work item: Required
  • Figma:
  • Technical Design Doc:
  • Dependencies:
    1. List any other PRs that should be merged before this PR is merged

Changes

In Scope

  • Provide a list of changes made in this PR

Not In Scope

  • Provide a list of changes that would make sense to have, but are not part of this PR and why

Media (Screenshots or Videos)

Provide screenshots or videos about the change made in this PR. For bugs, provide before and after so that reviewers can try it out themselves.

Select What Tests Should Run For This PR

  • accounts
  • accounts-vista
  • agent
  • agent-builder
  • article-content
  • article-content-block
  • article-directory-translations
  • article-templates
  • articles
  • articles-vista
  • chat-view
  • commands
  • commerce
  • connections
  • custom-objects-gantt-view
  • custom-objects-list-view
  • customer-portal
  • customer-portal-auth
  • customer-portal-knowledge-base
  • customer-portal-search
  • customer-portal-tickets
  • customer-widget
  • customers-list
  • cz-admin
  • cz-engine
  • dashboard-builder
  • dashboarding
  • dbm
  • directories
  • domain-identity
  • email-composer
  • email-integration
  • engagements
  • error-screens
  • fast-data-layer
  • identity-dev-members
  • identity-dev-orgs
  • identity-dev-users
  • imports
  • incidents
  • insights
  • invitations
  • issue-sidepanel
  • issues-gantt-view
  • issues-kanban-view
  • issues-list-view
  • jobs
  • left-panel
  • meetings
  • notification
  • notification-preferences
  • onboarding
  • opportunity
  • opportunity-sidepanel
  • part
  • part-enhancement
  • part-sidepanel
  • part-widget
  • parts-discovery
  • parts-list
  • parts-mfz-auth
  • plug-for-devrev
  • plug-inbox
  • plug-inbox-options
  • plug-platform-sdk
  • plug-platform-widget
  • portal-settings
  • query-cache
  • record-template
  • rev-users
  • rev-users-mfz-auth
  • rev-users-vista
  • search
  • security
  • sessions
  • settings
  • settings-mobile
  • setup
  • slas
  • snap-ins
  • snapkit-product-comments
  • sprints
  • tags
  • tasks
  • telephony
  • ticket-sidepanel
  • timeline
  • trails-mfz-auth
  • trails-v2
  • translations
  • user-access-mgmt-customer-roles
  • user-access-mgmt-groups
  • user-access-mgmt-segments
  • user-access-mgmt-user-roles
  • vista-gantt-view
  • vista-nnl
  • vista-shared
  • widgets
  • work
  • work-creation
  • work-creation-action
  • work-filters
  • work-kanban-vista
  • work-merge
  • work-sidepane
  • work-vista
  • workflows-config
  • workflows-creation
  • workflows-runs
  • works-clustering
  • works-table

Checklist

Author checklist

  • I have focused the PR on one thing
  • I have handled the isLoading and isError states of data-layer hooks
  • I have only exported members that are needed
  • I have considered using React.memo, useMemo and useCallback where appropriate
  • I have considered adding a feature flag if this is a feature
  • I have considered updating/adding documentation (README.md, Storybook stories, …)
  • I have considered updating/adding tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • I have considered removing possible dead code after I have removed the code
  • I have considered adding a test suite in run.yml, e2e-qa.yml and Aviator

Code reviewer checklist

As a code author, you can add an additional description here if you want the code reviewer to check additional things. Ex: As I made some changes in the plug platform, please check out that more thoroughly as I am not very confident with the changes there.

  • I am able to understand the purpose of the PR
  • I am able to read the code and understand it confidently
  • I have checked newly generated libraries are properly tagged and structured
  • I have checked for the possibility of reusing existing code
  • I have checked it follows our current best practices

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant