Skip to content

Conversation

@paulswartz
Copy link

For some implementations of relationships/2, it can be expensive to calculate.
For the top level, we've already calculated the relationships as a part of the
%ResourceObject{} so we don't need to do it again.

For some implementations of `relationships/2`, it can be expensive to calculate.
For the top level, we've already calculated the relationships as a part of the
`%ResourceObject{}` so we don't need to do it again.
@beerlington beerlington added the needs-review Needs review from repo maintainer label Dec 14, 2018
@beerlington beerlington added the 1.0.0 1.0.0 label Jun 3, 2019
@beerlington beerlington added this to the 1.0 milestone Jun 3, 2019
@beerlington beerlington self-assigned this Jun 3, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

1.0.0 1.0.0 needs-review Needs review from repo maintainer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants