Skip to content

Update README.md#90

Merged
ymatagne merged 1 commit intomainfrom
ymatagne-patch-51
Jul 28, 2025
Merged

Update README.md#90
ymatagne merged 1 commit intomainfrom
ymatagne-patch-51

Conversation

@ymatagne
Copy link
Contributor

@ymatagne ymatagne commented Jul 28, 2025

PR Type:

Documentation


PR Description:

  • Updated the README.md file to refine the description of the NUTS project.
  • Removed the phrase "Killer" from the project tagline for a more neutral tone.

PR Main Files Walkthrough:

files:
  • README.md: - Modified the tagline from "The AI-Powered CURL Killer 🚀" to "The AI-Powered CURL 🚀" to present a more neutral and professional tone in the project description.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the tagline in the README to reflect a more neutral branding.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 28, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
nuts ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 28, 2025 1:14am

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Walkthrough

The README file's main heading tagline was updated, changing the phrase from "The AI-Powered CURL Killer" to "The AI-Powered CURL." No other documentation or code was modified.

Changes

Cohort Files Change Summary
Documentation Branding README.md Updated main heading tagline to remove "Killer".

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A bunny with a pen, so spry,
Tweaked a tagline—oh my!
No more "Killer" in the air,
Just AI-Powered CURL, sleek and fair.
With gentle hops, the docs renew,
A softer tone, a clearer view.
🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch ymatagne-patch-51

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@wellcode-ai wellcode-ai bot added review-effort-1 Quick review (< 15 min) documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Review effort [1-5]: 1 labels Jul 28, 2025
@wellcode-ai
Copy link

wellcode-ai bot commented Jul 28, 2025

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Update the README.md file to refine the project description and present a more neutral tone.
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR updates the README.md file by modifying the project tagline to remove the word "Killer" for a more neutral and professional tone. The change aims to improve the project's presentation and align it with a broader audience.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Documentation
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • Focused PR: Yes, because the PR is solely focused on updating the README.md file to refine the project description.
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 1, because the PR involves a simple change in the README.md file with minimal complexity.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: The change in the README.md file is straightforward and improves the project's tone. Ensure that any other documentation or marketing materials are consistent with this updated tone.

How to use

Instructions

To invoke the Preston AI, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
/add_docs: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
/generate_labels: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.

@wellcode-ai
Copy link

wellcode-ai bot commented Jul 28, 2025

🔍 Code Quality Review

🟡 IMPORTANT: Insufficient Documentation and Testing

Documentation Issues

  • The README.md file lacks detailed instructions on how to set up and use the project, which can lead to confusion for new users. (README.md:1)

    // Current
    # Project Title
    
    This is a sample project.
    
    // Suggested
    # Project Title
    
    This project is designed to ...
    
    ## Installation
    
    To install the project, follow these steps:
    1. Step one
    2. Step two
    
    ## Usage
    
    To use the project, do the following:
    - Command 1
    - Command 2
    
  • There are no examples of how to use the functionality provided by the project, which can hinder understanding and adoption. (README.md:5)

    // Current
    No usage examples provided.
    
    // Suggested
    ## Usage Examples
    
    ```bash
    # Example command
    command --option value
    
    # Example code snippet
    import module
    module.function()

Testing Gaps

  • There are no tests included for the new functionality, which is critical for maintaining code quality and reliability. (N/A)

    // Current
    No tests provided.
    
    // Suggested
    Add unit tests for all new features to ensure functionality works as expected and to prevent regressions.
    

🤖 Generated with Wellcode.ai - AI-powered code review assistant

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

3-3: Ensure consistent casing for “curl” across the README

Most occurrences use the lowercase brand spelling “curl”, whereas the tagline uses all-caps “CURL”. Keeping the casing consistent avoids subtle style inconsistencies.

-**The AI-Powered CURL** 🚀
+**The AI-Powered curl** 🚀
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 424a763 and 38fcbad.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)
  • GitHub Check: Security audit
  • GitHub Check: Code coverage
  • GitHub Check: Build (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Build (macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Build (ubuntu-latest)

@ymatagne ymatagne merged commit 74fa82c into main Jul 28, 2025
6 of 9 checks passed
@wellcode-ai
Copy link

wellcode-ai bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Code Quality Report

Overall Score: 69/100 | Efficiency: 87 | Quality: 56 | Wellness: 63


Summary

This pull request shows good development practices with room for improvement in some areas. The work aligns well with team standards and contributes to project health.

Key Metrics

Category Score Highlights
Efficiency 87/100 Review Response Time: 0min, First Response Time: 0min
Quality 56/100 Security Score: 100, Complexity Trends: 100
Wellness 63/100 Feedback Reception: 1

Work Analysis

  • Feature Development: 0% (maintenance-focused)
  • Maintenance Work: 31%
  • Work Approach: Generally well-planned

Recommendations

  1. Enhance PR Description Quality: Your current PR description scored only 26.89, indicating a need for improvement in completeness and clarity.
  2. Increase Feature Work Engagement: Currently, your feature work percentage is at 0%, which suggests a lack of focus on new features.
  3. Optimize Communication Tone: Your communication tone score is at 50, which indicates a neutral sentiment in your comments.

Developer Progress

• Recent: 10 PRs merged, 17394 lines changed
• This PR: +70 points (Infinity% to next level)
• Rank: #? on team leaderboard

Team Performance

🏆 Team Leaderboard

Rank Developer Level Points
🥇 @ymatagne Legend 44 5212
🥈 @pimoussTO Engineer 437

Generated by Wellcode.aiView detailed report →

@wellcode-ai wellcode-ai bot added the Wellcode Score: 69 - Average Average code quality (60-74) label Jul 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Review effort [1-5]: 1 review-effort-1 Quick review (< 15 min) Wellcode Score: 69 - Average Average code quality (60-74)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant