Skip to content

feat: Add Amazon MQ infrastructure via pika_eda backend#396

Open
elitonzky wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feature/amazon-mq-pika-eda-setup
Open

feat: Add Amazon MQ infrastructure via pika_eda backend#396
elitonzky wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feature/amazon-mq-pika-eda-setup

Conversation

@elitonzky
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@elitonzky elitonzky commented Mar 6, 2026

What
Added infrastructure to extract messages from Amazon MQ via the pika_eda backend of weni-eda.

Why
Retail Setup needs to listen for Nexus events (sent via Amazon MQ) to react when a test project reaches its conversation limit. The existing RabbitMQ (EDA) does not connect to Amazon MQ, which requires AMQP over SSL on port 5671. pika_eda solves this using the same library already requested in the project.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.46%. Comparing base (eeaf0e4) to head (b7f1a34).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #396      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.45%   84.46%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         331      331              
  Lines       14780    14777       -3     
==========================================
- Hits        12483    12482       -1     
+ Misses       2297     2295       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
annotations 84.46% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
path 84.46% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
test_changes 84.46% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@elitonzky elitonzky requested a review from ericosta-dev March 6, 2026 15:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants