Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade date-fns from 2.30.0 to 3.0.0 #5711

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rubenfiszel
Copy link
Contributor

@rubenfiszel rubenfiszel commented May 7, 2025

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • frontend/package.json
  • frontend/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-BABELRUNTIME-10044504

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)


Important

Upgrade date-fns to 3.0.0 to fix a ReDoS vulnerability.

  • Dependencies:
    • Upgrade date-fns from 2.30.0 to 3.0.0 in frontend/package.json and frontend/package-lock.json.
  • Security:
    • Fixes Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability SNYK-JS-BABELRUNTIME-10044504.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 3c97901. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented May 7, 2025

Deploying windmill with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 3c97901
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://58e12bf3.windmill.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://snyk-fix-49ade0cb285adea6fde.windmill.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to 3c97901 in 52 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 13 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 1 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 2 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. frontend/package.json:105
  • Draft comment:
    Upgrading date-fns to v3 may introduce breaking API changes. Verify compatibility with existing code.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is about a dependency change and warns about potential breaking changes. It asks the author to verify compatibility, which is against the rules.
2. frontend/package.json:105
  • Draft comment:
    Upgrading date-fns from ^2.30.0 to ^3.0.0 is a breaking change. Ensure that all usages comply with the v3 migration guide and check compatibility with other dependencies (e.g., chartjs-adapter-date-fns).
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% The comment is about a dependency change, specifically upgrading a library version. It advises the author to ensure compatibility and check the migration guide, which falls under the rule of not commenting on dependency changes or asking the author to ensure compatibility.

Workflow ID: wflow_DFaFywQmlDXoXrfy

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants