Skip to content

Conversation

@tanclary
Copy link

No description provided.

Dimensions of type YESNO in LookML will never return NULL, so when we select a boolean column in the SQL Interface, we should never expect NULL.
</schema>
<tuple>
<value>%null%</value>
</tuple>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not familiar with the datasets, is this removing an expected column value or row value?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's removing a single cell from the expected results. you can see in the above tag the name of the column you're removing a row from.

Copy link

@Anthrino Anthrino Mar 13, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the info @tanclary, sorry missed checking information you added to the bug.
LGTM for the change.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No worries thanks for looking y'all 👍

Copy link

@Anthrino Anthrino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to confirm @tanclary, did we find a reason why Looker isn't returning these Null values?
Might be worth mentioning the reason we have to remove these from expected results.

@tanclary
Copy link
Author

Just to confirm @tanclary, did we find a reason why Looker isn't returning these Null values? Might be worth mentioning the reason we have to remove these from expected results.

Yes it's in the commit message and on the bug, tl:dr YESNO fields don't allow return NULL.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants