Conversation
removed some unused things
some other things to fix, but would probably want to do so in xarray first, since mostly copied from there
I think this is what it meant at least
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
|
Thanks for these edits @zmoon ! :) |
|
@zmoon Can you run black on |
|
@roxyboy, when are you planning to make the Also would you mind if I switch from |
| "and is now set to transformed coordinate's attribute 'direct_lag', " | ||
| "defaulting to zero if that attribute is not set." | ||
| ) | ||
| warnings.warn(msg, FutureWarning) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this still be FutureWarning given that it has already been changed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The defaults is still False for these flags I think in the current version.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The default lag is still None, but the behavior has changed slightly (ca652c9), since it now tries the default_lag attr before defaulting to 0.0, whereas before pretty much nothing was done for lag=None, making it effectively zero. So maybe just normal UserWarning instead of FutureWarning?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok sure, I'm ok with UserWarning
|
Also how big is the dataset for the MITgcm example? Could it be included in the repo or somewhere else where it could be downloaded? |
the latitude coordinates are different by floating point rounding error, needed to replace before subtracting
|
Thanks so much for this much needed maintenance @zmoon! We really appreciate your efforts! 🏆 I am fine with changing any of the configurations in the docs to make things easier going forward. myst_nb is definitely fine.
We could put it in Zenodo and use Pooch. Or we could use one one of the Pangeo Cloud datasets - https://catalog.pangeo.io/browse/master/ocean/channel/ |
This is a good question. What's the normal period/cycles packages allow for a deprecation...? |
|
Great work! I've found some small typos in the notebooks of zmoon:docs. I cannot comment it directly here, because the diff is too large. What is the best-practice-procedure here? Should I fork zmoon:docs and pull a request into his repo? One more thing: What about the |
|
I wanted to correct the other two notebooks that haven't been refactored in this PR: #185. |
|
View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB KevinYanesG commented on 2022-04-28T14:53:14Z Now I learned that we can review the notebooks cell by cell with this tool. As I said, I think in the last sentence we should have |
|


Update docs, configure some things that were not yet configured, ...
Remaining:
*to other signatures