Open
Conversation
|
Hello, how about the results of your reproduction experiment? Compared with those in the paper. @LouisCastricato |
Author
|
I published a relevant paper at WNU21. I didn't end up using this method since it over constrained the question generation in a way that I was not happy with. I used template-free methods based off of ATOMIC2020. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Do not merge directly, I changed some of the scripts (mostly removed the loading toy example components)
Originally the code was not using JSONs specifications. Particularly it was saving multiple JSON objects into a single .json file. This has now been fixed.