fix(selene): exclude .dependencies directory from linting

[yuys13]

Exclude .dependencies directory from selene linting to avoid reporting errors in external dependencies. This ensures that only the project's own code is checked.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @yuys13, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the project's linting setup by configuring the Selene linter to ignore external dependency files. This adjustment streamlines the development process by focusing linting efforts solely on the project's proprietary code, preventing irrelevant warnings or errors from third-party libraries.

Highlights

• Linting Configuration: The Selene linter configuration has been updated to exclude the .dependencies directory from its checks.
• Improved Linting Focus: This change ensures that Selene only reports issues within the project's own codebase, avoiding errors from external dependencies.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog

• selene.toml
  • Added an exclude rule to prevent linting of the .dependencies directory.

Activity

• No human activity has been recorded on this pull request yet.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request correctly identifies the need to exclude the .dependencies directory from linting by Selene. However, the glob pattern used can be made more robust. I've suggested a small change to ensure all subdirectories and files within the dependencies folder are recursively excluded, which will prevent potential future linting issues with nested dependencies.

[github-actions]

Code Metrics Report

	main (77228cf)	#57 (62b8972)	+/-
Coverage	63.4%	63.4%	0.0%
Test Execution Time	0s	1s	+1s

Details

  |                     | main (77228cf) | #57 (62b8972) | +/-  |
  |---------------------|----------------|---------------|------|
  | Coverage            |          63.4% |         63.4% | 0.0% |
  |   Files             |              6 |             6 |    0 |
  |   Lines             |            208 |           208 |    0 |
  |   Covered           |            132 |           132 |    0 |
- | Test Execution Time |             0s |            1s |  +1s |

---

Reported by octocov