-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
boards: efm32gg11: Enable Si7210 Hall-effect sensor #95341
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
boards: efm32gg11: Enable Si7210 Hall-effect sensor #95341
Conversation
Enable Si7210 Hall-effect sensor node under I2C2 in slstk3701a DTS for magnetic field sensing. Include a 3.3V fixed regulator (sensor-enable) via GPIO for power control. Co-developed-by: Elgin Perumbilly <elgin.perumbilly@siliconsignals.io> Signed-off-by: Elgin Perumbilly <elgin.perumbilly@siliconsignals.io> Signed-off-by: Silicon-Signals <siliconsignalsforgit@gmail.com>
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
About the commit log:
- the title should start with
boards: silabs: slstk3701a:
(the name of the board isslstk3701a
, notefm32gg11
). Signed-off-by:
must be associated to an individual.siliconsignalsforgit@gmail.com
is not valid.
Otherwise, fine.
Thanks for the feedback
Sure, will change it.
I understand that Zephyr's guidelines require the email to match the one used to author the commit and that it shouldn't be a no-reply or anonymized address. However, the email address siliconsignalsforgit@gmail.com Given this, I would prefer to retain this SoB. For reference, we've used the same sign-off (with siliconsignalsforgit@gmail.com) in a previous PR: #91173 |
[...]
@MaureenHelm, @pdgendt, was it an oversight or do you confirm this complies with the guidelines? |
Erm, I don't know. Should ask the experts here @kartben @keith-zephyr |
I think the guidelines are pretty clear - you must "use your legal name (pseudonyms, hacker handles, and the names of groups are not allowed)" I personally have no issues with the email address per-se (it's really not so different from e.g. jane.doe+githubstuff@gmail.com), as long as there is a "real" author in front of it. |
@Silicon-Signals, you can use (assuming you are Elgin Perumbilly):
(@kartben, correct me if I am wrong) |
We are using the same SoB for all developments in Zephyr across our company to ensure that our work can be easily tracked. I am not breaking any rules according to Zephyr's guidelines. As @kartben mentioned, as long as there is a "real" author listed, there shouldn't be any issues, so I prefer to let it be. |
I have to admit that I am really missing your point here? Is it any harder to track commits authored by someone with an email address from your domain?
See below :)
You might have misunderstood me. The guidelines are pretty clear and the git author should be a real person's legal name. |
I am closing this PR. Link PR: #95405 |
you really shouldn't be doing this though :) Amending the commit from this PR would have been much preferred. |
Sorry about that. I should have asked you before doing this. |
Enable Si7210 Hall-effect sensor node under I2C2 in slstk3701a DTS for magnetic field sensing. Include a 3.3V fixed regulator (sensor-enable) via GPIO for power control.