Skip to content

Conversation

Silicon-Signals
Copy link
Contributor

Enable Si7210 Hall-effect sensor node under I2C2 in slstk3701a DTS for magnetic field sensing. Include a 3.3V fixed regulator (sensor-enable) via GPIO for power control.

Enable Si7210 Hall-effect sensor node under I2C2 in slstk3701a DTS for
magnetic field sensing. Include a 3.3V fixed regulator (sensor-enable)
via GPIO for power control.

Co-developed-by: Elgin Perumbilly <elgin.perumbilly@siliconsignals.io>
Signed-off-by: Elgin Perumbilly <elgin.perumbilly@siliconsignals.io>
Signed-off-by: Silicon-Signals <siliconsignalsforgit@gmail.com>
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 2, 2025

Copy link
Contributor

@jerome-pouiller jerome-pouiller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

About the commit log:

  • the title should start with boards: silabs: slstk3701a: (the name of the board is slstk3701a, not efm32gg11).
  • Signed-off-by: must be associated to an individual. siliconsignalsforgit@gmail.com is not valid.

Otherwise, fine.

@Silicon-Signals
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jerome-pouiller

Thanks for the feedback

About the commit log:

  • the title should start with boards: silabs: slstk3701a: (the name of the board is slstk3701a, not efm32gg11).

Sure, will change it.

  • Signed-off-by: must be associated to an individual. siliconsignalsforgit@gmail.com is not valid.

I understand that Zephyr's guidelines require the email to match the one used to author the commit and that it shouldn't be a no-reply or anonymized address. However, the email address siliconsignalsforgit@gmail.com
is actively managed by an individual on our team, not a generic no-reply address. It is being used to represent contributions from the team, but it is indeed associated with an actual person.

Given this, I would prefer to retain this SoB.

For reference, we've used the same sign-off (with siliconsignalsforgit@gmail.com) in a previous PR: #91173

@jerome-pouiller
Copy link
Contributor

[...]

  • Signed-off-by: must be associated to an individual. siliconsignalsforgit@gmail.com is not valid.

I understand that Zephyr's guidelines require the email to match the one used to author the commit and that it shouldn't be a no-reply or anonymized address. However, the email address siliconsignalsforgit@gmail.com is actively managed by an individual on our team, not a generic no-reply address. It is being used to represent contributions from the team, but it is indeed associated with an actual person.

Given this, I would prefer to retain this SoB.

For reference, we've used the same sign-off (with siliconsignalsforgit@gmail.com) in a previous PR: #91173

@MaureenHelm, @pdgendt, was it an oversight or do you confirm this complies with the guidelines?

@pdgendt
Copy link
Contributor

pdgendt commented Sep 3, 2025

@MaureenHelm, @pdgendt, was it an oversight or do you confirm this complies with the guidelines?

Erm, I don't know. Should ask the experts here @kartben @keith-zephyr

@kartben
Copy link
Contributor

kartben commented Sep 3, 2025

I think the guidelines are pretty clear - you must "use your legal name (pseudonyms, hacker handles, and the names of groups are not allowed)"
https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/contribute/guidelines.html#dco-sign-off

I personally have no issues with the email address per-se (it's really not so different from e.g. jane.doe+githubstuff@gmail.com), as long as there is a "real" author in front of it.

@jerome-pouiller
Copy link
Contributor

@Silicon-Signals, you can use (assuming you are Elgin Perumbilly):

Signed-off-by: Elgin Perumbilly <siliconsignalsforgit@gmail.com>

(@kartben, correct me if I am wrong)

@Silicon-Signals
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jerome-pouiller

We are using the same SoB for all developments in Zephyr across our company to ensure that our work can be easily tracked.

I am not breaking any rules according to Zephyr's guidelines.

As @kartben mentioned, as long as there is a "real" author listed, there shouldn't be any issues, so I prefer to let it be.

@kartben
Copy link
Contributor

kartben commented Sep 3, 2025

We are using the same SoB for all developments in Zephyr across our company to ensure that our work can be easily tracked.

I have to admit that I am really missing your point here? Is it any harder to track commits authored by someone with an email address from your domain?

I am not breaking any rules according to Zephyr's guidelines.

See below :)

As @kartben mentioned, as long as there is a "real" author listed, there shouldn't be any issues, so I prefer to let it be.

You might have misunderstood me. The guidelines are pretty clear and the git author should be a real person's legal name.

@Silicon-Signals
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jerome-pouiller @kartben

I am closing this PR.
Elgin has sent a new PR with his SoB and also changed the subject line.

Link PR: #95405

@Silicon-Signals Silicon-Signals deleted the enable_si7210_sensor branch September 3, 2025 13:04
@kartben
Copy link
Contributor

kartben commented Sep 3, 2025

@jerome-pouiller @kartben

I am closing this PR. Elgin has sent a new PR with his SoB and also changed the subject line.

Link PR: #95405

you really shouldn't be doing this though :) Amending the commit from this PR would have been much preferred.

@Silicon-Signals
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jerome-pouiller @kartben
I am closing this PR. Elgin has sent a new PR with his SoB and also changed the subject line.
Link PR: #95405

you really shouldn't be doing this though :) Amending the commit from this PR would have been much preferred.

Sorry about that. I should have asked you before doing this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
platform: Silabs Silicon Labs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants