Skip to content

feat(wallet/transactions): add transaction detail view with improved token/NFT display and navigation#3482

Merged
domw30 merged 5 commits intomainfrom
feat/add-transaction-detail-view-with-improved-token-nft-display-and-navigation
Dec 10, 2025
Merged

feat(wallet/transactions): add transaction detail view with improved token/NFT display and navigation#3482
domw30 merged 5 commits intomainfrom
feat/add-transaction-detail-view-with-improved-token-nft-display-and-navigation

Conversation

@domw30
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@domw30 domw30 commented Dec 9, 2025

What does this do?

We're adding a transaction detail view that opens when clicking transactions, updating navigation to use hash-action URLs for unique identification, displaying proper token names/symbols/icons, showing NFT placeholders for NFTs, making token IDs copyable and truncated, and simplifying transaction type categorization to use the API type field directly.

Why are we making this change?

To improve UX by showing detailed transaction information in-app instead of opening external explorers, and to properly support and display the various transaction types (ERC-20 tokens, NFTs, mints, burns) with accurate token information from the API response.

How do I test this?

Key decisions and Risk Assessment:

Things to consider:

  1. How will this affect security?
  2. How will this affect performance?
  3. Does this change any APIs?

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Dec 9, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Updated (UTC)
z-os Ready Ready Preview Dec 10, 2025 2:57am

@domw30 domw30 merged commit a08db3b into main Dec 10, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
@domw30 domw30 deleted the feat/add-transaction-detail-view-with-improved-token-nft-display-and-navigation branch December 10, 2025 02:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant