Skip to content

Conversation

@adnpark
Copy link
Contributor

@adnpark adnpark commented Nov 28, 2024

No description provided.

import { parseAccount } from "viem/accounts"
import { getAction } from "viem/utils"

export type ClientWithChainId<
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we need ClientWithChainId? Couldn't we just get it from original client like this client.chain.id ?

import { parseAccount } from "viem/accounts"
import { getAction } from "viem/utils"

export type ClientWithChainId<
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same here...

Copy link
Collaborator

@SahilVasava SahilVasava left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • The sendUserOperations could be simplified further. But should be fine for now.
  • Since it doesn't work with Alchemy, we should investigate further. Although we can release this version to unblock the customer meanwhile.
  • multiChainEcdsa tests are passing with Pimlico so all good
  • We should test multiChainWebAuthn as well

@adnpark adnpark marked this pull request as ready for review November 29, 2024 11:49
@adnpark adnpark merged commit 2360061 into main Nov 29, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants