Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it: It doesn't look like the /api/admin/settings/{name} call was updated correctly when validation was added. This PR catches the correct exception type to return a 400 {"status":"ERROR","message":"The name of the setting is invalid."} response instead of a 500 and a stack trace in the log for a bad setting name.
Which issue(s) this PR closes:
Special notes for your reviewer:
#12077 suggests a larger refactor, but it would be good to have some fix.
Suggestions on how to test this: Call http://localhost:8080/api/admin/settings/badsetting before and after the PR. Note the error fix
Does this PR introduce a user interface change? If mockups are available, please link/include them here:
Is there a release notes update needed for this change?:
Additional documentation: