Skip to content

Add ruff formatter #47

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
reweeden merged 3 commits into from
Sep 11, 2025
Merged

Add ruff formatter #47

reweeden merged 3 commits into from
Sep 11, 2025

Conversation

@reweeden
Copy link
Contributor

@reweeden reweeden commented Sep 3, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Pull Request Checklist

I have:

  • performed a self review of my code I&A code style
    • Resources and Data Structures are sorted by ABC or a defined sorting pattern
  • updated the documentation accordingly
  • verified required action checks are passing
  • bumped the version number as appropriate

@reweeden reweeden changed the title Add ruff formatter GitHub action Add ruff formatter Sep 3, 2025
@reweeden reweeden force-pushed the rew/add-ruff-formatter branch 4 times, most recently from 387ca03 to 8680cbd Compare September 3, 2025 20:54
@reweeden reweeden marked this pull request as ready for review September 3, 2025 22:08
@mattp0 mattp0 mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2025
Merged
4 tasks
@reweeden reweeden force-pushed the rew/add-ruff-formatter branch from 8680cbd to 6d744ce Compare September 11, 2025 15:36
@reweeden reweeden merged commit 69970ef into main Sep 11, 2025
10 checks passed
@reweeden reweeden deleted the rew/add-ruff-formatter branch September 11, 2025 20:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@mattp0 mattp0 mattp0 approved these changes

@benbart benbart Awaiting requested review from benbart

@mckadesorensen mckadesorensen Awaiting requested review from mckadesorensen

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@reweeden @mattp0