Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 12, 2021. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@berezovskyi
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #21

Closes #21

Change-Id: I307ec568dd575bd87b8903770d4acf3166d22522
Signed-off-by: Andrew Berezovskyi <andriib@kth.se>
@berezovskyi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jadelkhoury @jamsden please review

@berezovskyi
Copy link
Contributor Author

berezovskyi commented Apr 22, 2019

Alternatively, we can switch to a new provider as shown in #76 and leave this without changes but I can't imagine how this change would cause any backwards compatibility problems.

@jamsden
Copy link

jamsden commented Apr 23, 2019

I am unable to review, clicking Add you review never completes.

@berezovskyi
Copy link
Contributor Author

You can post it here if you wish.

Copy link
Contributor

@jadelkhoury jadelkhoury left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reviewed with Andrii. Looks good

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

isWriteable() check prevents from return an array of *different* RDF resources

3 participants