chore: Fix flaky testCreateAndUpdateTableWithPolicyTags test#4122
chore: Fix flaky testCreateAndUpdateTableWithPolicyTags test#4122
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request resolves a flakiness issue in an integration test by enhancing the uniqueness of resource identifiers. The change ensures that parallel executions of the test do not interfere with each other due to name collisions, leading to more reliable test results and a stable testing environment. Highlights
Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request fixes a flaky test by using a UUID for generating a unique taxonomy display name, which is a good improvement. My feedback includes a suggestion to use the full UUID instead of a truncated one to make the fix more robust and prevent future collisions. I've also suggested a minor simplification to the string formatting for better readability.
| .setDisplayName( | ||
| String.format( | ||
| "testing taxonomy %s", UUID.randomUUID().toString().substring(0, 8))) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While using a UUID is a great improvement for uniqueness over Instant.now().getNano(), truncating it to 8 characters reduces its entropy and still leaves a small chance of collision, which could lead to test flakiness in the future. To ensure uniqueness across the organization as the comment suggests, it would be more robust to use the full UUID. If there is a length limit for DisplayName, it would be helpful to document that with a comment.
Additionally, for simple string concatenation, using the + operator is often more readable and can be more efficient than String.format.
.setDisplayName("testing taxonomy " + UUID.randomUUID().toString())
Fixes #4097