feat: Updated add "Go Back" and "Up Next" buttons for specification navig…

[vtushar06]

… versions (#1618)

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Bugfix — improves UI/UX through enhanced navigation between Specification version pages.

Issue Number:
• Closes #1618

Screenshots/videos:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7815d73e-23ed-4cb0-9b75-693a8bb183b1

If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Not applicable — changes are limited to component-level enhancements.

Summary
This pull request addresses the missing "Go Back" and "Up Next" navigation buttons across the Specification version pages, as discussed in issue #1618.
As part of this contribution:
• I implemented a reusable navigation component for consistency.
• Integrated the component into five Specification version pages to ensure seamless traversal across document versions.
• Validated the functionality across all affected routes for correct previous/next link logic.
• Ensured the code adheres to existing linting and styling standards.

These enhancements improve overall documentation navigation flow and accessibility for users referring to different spec versions.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No — the implementation is fully backward compatible and isolated to specific pages.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

ScreenRecording.mp4

[github-actions]

built with Refined Cloudflare Pages Action

⚡ Cloudflare Pages Deployment

Name	Status	Preview	Last Commit
website	✅ Ready (View Log)	Visit Preview	b5f2849

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (main@7e78fe8). Learn more about missing BASE report.
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             main     #1743   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage        ?   100.00%           
========================================
  Files           ?        29           
  Lines           ?       548           
  Branches        ?       158           
========================================
  Hits            ?       548           
  Misses          ?         0           
  Partials        ?         0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[Utkarsh-123github]

Great job ! @vtushar06 .
Just some small extra changes are to be reverted in the formatting part which I have suggested in the attached video, fixing those changes will make this PR ready to be merged.
Please refer to it.
Thank you !

2025-06-28.20-46-38.mp4

[vtushar06]

hey @Utkarsh-123github sir, I reverted changes which you pointed out, Thanks for detail guidance
will love to work with you in future and JSON org team.
Thank you so much.
@vtushar06

[Utkarsh-123github]

Good work @vtushar06 !
LGTM 🚀

[vtushar06]

Thanks a lot @Utkarsh-123github, Please can you suggest me others challenging issues where i can spend good amount of time in solving that.

[Utkarsh-123github]

You're most welcome! @vtushar06

I'd suggest exploring the open issues in the repo , there are quite a few that might match your interest and skills. If you find any that you feel are challenging and you'd enjoy working on, feel free to drop a comment on the issue or let me know directly. If it's unassigned and fits well, we can definitely get it assigned to you! 🚀

[vtushar06]

Thank you so much @Utkarsh-123github for this humble response,
I will go through old issue and let you know which i finds more challenging one .
@vtushar06