Skip to content

Conversation

@Kovy95
Copy link
Contributor

@Kovy95 Kovy95 commented Dec 2, 2025

Description

  • change forEach to for

Fixes NAE-2290

Dependencies

none

Third party dependencies

  • No new dependencies were introduced

Blocking Pull requests

There are no dependencies on other PR

How Has Been This Tested?

manually

Test Configuration

Name Tested on
OS LinuxMint22
Runtime Node.js 20
Dependency Manager NPM 10
Framework version Angular 17
Run parameters
Other configuration

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • My changes have been checked, personally or remotely, with @...
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have resolved all conflicts with the target branch of the PR
  • I have updated and synced my code with the target branch
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing tests pass locally with my changes:
    • Lint test
    • Unit tests
    • Integration tests
  • I have checked my contribution with code analysis tools:
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation:
    • Developer documentation
    • User Guides
    • Migration Guides

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Performance Improvements
    • Task reference lookup now exits immediately when a matching reference is found, shortening lookup time and improving responsiveness for task-related views and operations. This reduces unnecessary processing without changing visible behavior when no match exists.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@Kovy95 Kovy95 self-assigned this Dec 2, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Walkthrough

Replaced the inner iteration over referencedTaskIds in findTaskRefId with a for...of loop to allow an early return when a matching TaskRefField is found. No public signatures changed; behavior when no match is found remains the same.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
TaskContentService loop change
projects/netgrif-components-core/src/lib/task-content/services/task-content.service.ts
Replaced Array.forEach iteration over referencedTaskIds with a for...of loop in findTaskRefId, enabling immediate return once a matching TaskRefField is found (short-circuits search).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Check that early exit is intended and doesn't skip necessary side effects (none expected).
  • Verify behavior when no match is found remains unchanged.

Possibly related PRs

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly describes the main issue being fixed (couldn't find referenced task in taskref from event outcome) and maps to the code change (replacing forEach with for-of loop for early return). It is specific and directly related to the primary purpose of the changeset.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3b1f375 and 3c31c12.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • projects/netgrif-components-core/src/lib/task-content/services/task-content.service.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
projects/netgrif-components-core/src/lib/task-content/services/task-content.service.ts (1)
projects/netgrif-components-core/src/lib/task-content/task-content/abstract-task-content.component.ts (1)
  • taskId (160-162)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: Matrix Test (14)
  • GitHub Check: Matrix Test (16)
  • GitHub Check: Matrix Test (18)
  • GitHub Check: Test with SonarCloud

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot added the bugfix label Dec 2, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 42949df and 3b1f375.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • projects/netgrif-components-core/src/lib/task-content/services/task-content.service.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
projects/netgrif-components-core/src/lib/task-content/services/task-content.service.ts (1)
projects/netgrif-components-core/src/lib/task-content/task-content/abstract-task-content.component.ts (1)
  • taskId (160-162)

tuplle
tuplle previously approved these changes Dec 2, 2025
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 2, 2025
# Conflicts:
#	projects/netgrif-components-core/src/lib/task-content/services/task-content.service.ts
@tuplle tuplle dismissed stale reviews from coderabbitai[bot] and themself via 3c31c12 December 2, 2025 15:39
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 2, 2025

@tuplle tuplle merged commit fb3587d into release/6.4.2 Dec 2, 2025
10 of 11 checks passed
@tuplle tuplle deleted the NAE-2290 branch December 2, 2025 15:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants