-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Login main 오류 수정 #10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Login main 오류 수정 #10
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several significant changes to the application's authentication, error handling, and cart management systems. The modifications include updating the security configuration, adding a global exception handler, refactoring the login controller with improved request handling, introducing a new login request object, and implementing a model cart service. The changes aim to enhance the application's security, error response, and user interaction capabilities. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant LoginController
participant UserRepository
participant SecurityConfig
User->>LoginController: POST /api/auth/login
LoginController->>UserRepository: Validate credentials
UserRepository-->>LoginController: User details
alt Credentials valid
LoginController->>SecurityConfig: Authenticate user
SecurityConfig-->>LoginController: Authentication success
LoginController-->>User: Login successful
else Credentials invalid
LoginController-->>User: Login failed
end
Possibly Related PRs
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (13)
src/main/java/com/example/redunm/modellist/DataModelController.java (4)
12-13: Adopt consistent REST conventions & consider method-level security
Switching to@RestControllerand assigning@RequestMapping("/api/models")is a solid approach for REST endpoints. As a future enhancement, consider adding role-based access controls at the class or method level if only certain user roles should access these resources.
17-17: Use constructor injection for better testability
While field injection with@Autowiredis common, constructor injection often provides clearer dependencies, easier testing, and immutability benefits.
19-26: Standardize error responses for unauthorized requests
Returning 401 is correct for unauthorized requests, but consider returning a more structured JSON format (e.g.,{"error": "로그인이 필요합니다."}) or leveraging a global exception handler for consistency across the application.
28-30: Consider pagination or filtering for large data sets
If theDataModelcollection grows large, returning all records may degrade performance and user experience. Implementing pagination, filtering, or other constraints could be beneficial.src/main/java/com/example/redunm/modellist/DataModelCartController.java (3)
16-17: Consider using constructor injection
Field injection can limit testability. Constructor-based injection is generally recommended for better immutability and clearer dependencies.- @Autowired - private ModelCartService cartService; + private final ModelCartService cartService; + public DataModelCartController(ModelCartService cartService) { + this.cartService = cartService; + }
50-58: Return a more descriptive response when the model is not found
Currently, returning an empty list may mask the fact that the requested model does not exist. Consider returning a 404 response or throwing a custom exception for clarity.
68-71: Consider returning success status or updated cart
Clearing the cart is successful, but providing a simple success message or returning the updated cart (now empty) can improve clarity.src/main/java/com/example/redunm/login/LoginRequest.java (1)
9-23: Validation annotations
Consider adding validation annotations (e.g.,@NotBlank,src/main/java/com/example/redunm/exception/GlobalExceptionHandler.java (1)
1-18: Log exceptions for debugging
Currently, the code only returns a response. Consider logging these exceptions to diagnose issues more easily.src/main/java/com/example/redunm/modellist/ModelCartService.java (2)
24-24: In-memory cart storage
Keep in mind that this data is ephemeral. Consider persisting user cart data in a more robust storage (e.g., DB or Redis) for production.
59-67: Removal logic
The removeModel method modifies the cart in-place. If concurrency is a concern, an atomic approach or synchronization on the list might be needed.src/main/java/com/example/redunm/login/LoginController.java (2)
22-23: Consider injecting theBCryptPasswordEncoderas a Spring bean.
Although creating a new instance works, injecting it from Spring’s context improves testability and consistency across the application.- private final BCryptPasswordEncoder passwordEncoder = new BCryptPasswordEncoder(); + @Autowired + private BCryptPasswordEncoder passwordEncoder;
31-35: Clarify the HTTP 400 response for missing credentials.
Returning a specific error message is beneficial for user experience. Consider a single JSON response object for all errors for uniform handling.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
src/main/java/com/example/redunm/config/SecurityConfig.java(2 hunks)src/main/java/com/example/redunm/exception/GlobalExceptionHandler.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/example/redunm/login/LoginController.java(3 hunks)src/main/java/com/example/redunm/login/LoginRequest.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/example/redunm/modellist/DataModelCartController.java(3 hunks)src/main/java/com/example/redunm/modellist/DataModelController.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/example/redunm/modellist/ModelCartService.java(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (21)
src/main/java/com/example/redunm/modellist/DataModelController.java (1)
4-6: Imports align well with the new REST-based response handling
These imports are appropriate for implementing RESTful endpoint responses (e.g., ResponseEntity and status codes). Good choice to facilitate more flexible HTTP status handling.
src/main/java/com/example/redunm/modellist/DataModelCartController.java (8)
3-7: Imports look good
No issues detected in these newly added imports.
19-19: No functional changes
This comment helps readers navigate the code sections.
46-46: No functional changes
This comment clarifies the API section separation.
61-61: No functional changes
This comment indicates the start of the getCart method.
64-65: Straightforward retrieval of cart
The getCart method cleanly delegates cart retrieval to cartService.
67-67: No functional changes
This comment indicates the start of the clearCart method.
73-73: No functional changes
This comment indicates the start of removeModelFromCart method.
74-77: Ensure consistency with other removal outcomes
Removing a single model from the cart currently returns the cart contents. Verify that the client expectations align with this response if the model does not exist.
src/main/java/com/example/redunm/config/SecurityConfig.java (3)
9-9: Use of AbstractHttpConfigurer::disable
Switching from a lambda to a method reference is clear and concise.
20-20: CSRF disabled
Disabling CSRF is acceptable for stateless APIs, but ensure there are other safeguards against CSRF attacks if any session or cookie-based authentication is used.
26-31: Permitting new login endpoints
Ensure these endpoints are necessary and do not inadvertently allow unauthorized access to protected resources.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the security configuration and endpoints.
Let me check the actual endpoint mappings in these controllers to ensure they match the security configuration.
Security configuration appears appropriate for authentication endpoints
The security configuration is properly structured:
- All permitted endpoints under
/api/auth/**are strictly for authentication purposes (login and signup flows) - The configuration follows the principle of least privilege with
.anyRequest().authenticated() - The permitted static resource paths (
/css/**,/js/**,/models/**) are standard for web applications - The controllers match the permitted paths exactly, showing a clear signup flow (steps 1-4) and login functionality
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Confirm the routes do not cover protected resources
rg -A 3 "requestMatchers"
Length of output: 509
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete security configuration and other potential matchers
rg -A 10 "SecurityFilterChain|requestMatchers|antMatchers"
# Look for controller mappings for these paths
rg -l "@(RequestMapping|GetMapping|PostMapping|PutMapping|DeleteMapping).*(/api/auth/|/auth/)"
Length of output: 3011
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual endpoint mappings in the controllers
rg -B 2 -A 2 "@(RequestMapping|GetMapping|PostMapping|PutMapping|DeleteMapping).*(/api/auth/|/auth/)" src/main/java/com/example/redunm/login/LoginController.java src/main/java/com/example/redunm/signup/*.java
# Check if there are any other security-related configurations
rg -l "WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter|SecurityConfiguration|@PreAuthorize|@Secured|@RolesAllowed"
Length of output: 2991
src/main/java/com/example/redunm/login/LoginController.java (9)
5-5: Use of the new LoginRequest import is appropriate.
This structured object is preferable to a raw map, as it makes the code more self-documenting and avoids potential key mismatches.
10-10: Good choice using BCryptPasswordEncoder for better security.
Relying on industry-standard hashing is advisable for password checks.
26-26: Method signature change to LoginRequest improves maintainability.
This is a more robust design than using a map, allowing for straightforward validation and future expansion.
28-29: Fetching email and password from LoginRequest.
This logic is concise and clear.
37-37: Usage of var optionalUser = userService.findByEmail(email) is convenient.
This is a neat way to reduce boilerplate. Just ensure you preserve readability when mixing var with more complex types.
41-41: Clear error message for nonexistent email.
This is informative, though consider localizing or externalizing error messages if supporting multiple languages in the future.
46-46: Secure password comparison.
Using BCryptPasswordEncoder.matches is the correct approach.
57-63: Explicit GET handling with METHOD_NOT_ALLOWED.
This ensures a clear response for clients that mistakenly use the wrong HTTP verb.
Line range hint 65-69: Session invalidation on logout is correctly implemented.
This approach effectively ends the user session. No issues spotted.
| private String email; | ||
| private String password; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Security warning: Storing passwords in plain text
Consider securing passwords via hashing before storing or transmitting them.
| public List<DataModel> getCart(String userId) { | ||
| return userCartMap.getOrDefault(userId, Collections.emptyList()); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Returning a mutable list
Since getCart returns the actual list, external modifications while still referencing the same list can cause inconsistent states. Consider returning an unmodifiable list or a defensive copy.
-public List<DataModel> getCart(String userId) {
- return userCartMap.getOrDefault(userId, Collections.emptyList());
+public List<DataModel> getCart(String userId) {
+ List<DataModel> cart = userCartMap.getOrDefault(userId, Collections.emptyList());
+ return List.copyOf(cart); // returns an unmodifiable copy
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public List<DataModel> getCart(String userId) { | |
| return userCartMap.getOrDefault(userId, Collections.emptyList()); | |
| } | |
| public List<DataModel> getCart(String userId) { | |
| List<DataModel> cart = userCartMap.getOrDefault(userId, Collections.emptyList()); | |
| return List.copyOf(cart); // returns an unmodifiable copy | |
| } |
| // userId가 가진 장바구니 목록 가져오기 (없으면 새 리스트) | ||
| List<DataModel> cartList = userCartMap.getOrDefault(userId, new ArrayList<>()); | ||
| cartList.add(model); | ||
|
|
||
| // 갱신된 목록을 다시 put | ||
| userCartMap.put(userId, cartList); | ||
|
|
||
| return cartList; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Race condition risk in cart operations due to non-thread-safe ArrayList
The verification confirms the concern. While the service uses ConcurrentHashMap for thread-safe map operations, it uses a regular ArrayList for the cart items which is not thread-safe. This can lead to race conditions when multiple threads attempt to modify the same user's cart simultaneously.
Specific issues:
- The
getOrDefault()and subsequentput()operations are not atomic - The
ArrayListoperations (add()) are not thread-safe - Multiple threads could read and modify the same list concurrently
To fix this, consider:
- Using
Collections.synchronizedList()to wrap the ArrayList - Using
CopyOnWriteArrayListfor better concurrent read performance - Implementing proper synchronization around the cart modification operations
🔗 Analysis chain
Concurrent updates
Adding models to the cart can be subject to race conditions. While ConcurrentHashMap is thread-safe, the list itself can be a regular ArrayList, which is not thread-safe.
Let me check the implementation of ModelCartService to understand the concurrency handling better.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Searching for usage of `addToCart` in the codebase to confirm concurrency safety or synchronization approach
rg -A 5 "addToCart"
Length of output: 2071
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the ModelCartService class implementation for ConcurrentHashMap and any synchronization
rg -A 10 "class ModelCartService"
Length of output: 1094
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores