Conversation
miri64
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Murdock results gave some insights
|
@kaspar030 this one needs rebase. |
|
@francois-berder closed #12230, so this is not waiting for other PR's anymore (this includes the changes from that PR. I realized that an improvement to codespell got in here accidentally. I reverted the commit here and split it into #12570. |
done |
what do we do about these? I feel like they are way to specific to add to Why is travis complaining about |
I think travis fails because this PR has fixme commits. cppcheck is the last check, but the warnings are not causing the failure. |
But |
yeah, totally right. I guess the errors were already in there, and now that the files got touched, cppcheck checks them. the native irq_cpu seems to be a false positive. I'm checking the others. |
|
Ok, there are a lot of cppcheck errors in master. Fixing them is too much for a supposed-to-be-trivial PR. I suggest splitting the offending commits out of this PR. |
Yep, go ahead. Maybe open an issue on the cpp stuff. |
|
Ok, with a lot of git, grep and shell magic I managed to filter all commits that touch files that are flagged by cppcheck. Unfortunately that includes @francois-berder's commit. (I'll probably cut that and filter by file). |
Hmm, I think the best way to tackle this would be to fix all the cpp errors first then. I'll try to find time. |
|
@kaspar030 opened #12764 to try and unblock this :) |
|
@kaspar030 this one needs rebasing now. |
|
@kaspar030 Great job 👍 It's not wondering that the changes in |
Also @francois-berder, half this PR is his work.
Ok, I just skipped those. Thanks! |
Of course, great job @francois-berder 👍 |
|
@kaspar030 had the build pass except for you last fix up? |
Mostly. There were some warnings: some typos left, "Fix Typos" was bothering the PR check, and the header guard check correctly complained about the file fixed in the last fixup. |
|
when running localy I still get some errors unflagged by murdock. ./dist/tools/codespell/check.shI would add I think some of the erros should only be filtered out for the specific files (e.g: |
@fjmolinas this is passing now, but stales quickly. Needs an ACK... |
Can we postpone fixing them? This PR stales quickly, and fixing more typos requires going through all false positives again. |
gschorcht
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The number of remaining false positives is very low. Let's go with it. To rebase and resolve conflicts again and again is a pain.
|
Thanks @gschorcht @fjmolinas! |
Contribution description
This PR applies codespell fix suggestions throughout the codebase.
It is based on a rebased and squashed #12230.
Testing procedure
Issues/PRs references